CO129-541-11 Cheng Kwok Yau- trial judge's notes 1-1-1932 - 31-12-1932 — Page 30

30

81.8.1932.

Resumed. Pressit.

Jakin, continu96; Analyses summing up.

SHELDON for the Crow. Oase long, but not difficult.Evidena e

of this olers admitted frequently. Evidence of different crimes

with one und in view is always admissible. 13 Halsbury D.447 8.821.

para 2(four heads). Phipson th.d.p.152. Phinson Manual-p.so

Evidence overwhelming. R.v.Ball (1911) A.0.4” (Lord Atkinson).

-Uskin.v.A.0. of N.S,W,"

*

R.V.Birkloy 13 Cox0.0.

*R.v.Thompson" (Lord Dunedin)

(Lord Atkinson).

R.v.Haga??" 12 Cox.

• H.v. Harris" 4 P & P 342 (at p.343)

*R.v.Lovegrove" (1080) 3K.B.643.

"Gap" in every one9.

(Antipathy).

Evidence that Lu me agent of prisoner:-

(a) Lau e chauffeur of prisoner.

(b) Under obligation to prisoner and ready to sasist in

murdering Fun.

(0) Teui'e svideos that Lau procured himself and another for

murder on 24th. Maroh,

(d) Wong Tsui and Lau watched Fung together on ath. March.

(*) Prisoner's knowledge on 20th March of failure of Laure

abortive attempt of 19th March.

(f) Hypodermic syringe sem in Leu's possession by Taui

between onth to 24th March.

(0.J."A differ mt syringe")

(g) Prisoner knew of attempt on 34th Maroh (Arsh, daposition read

at trial - 7.49 deposition) (wife of Lau).

-

(h) Prisoner,e motive.

(1)Fung no other mmi98(other than priemer).

List of facts possibly not exhaustion.

Jury driven to conclusion.

(Sslf: R.v.Rodley" will you deal with this?)

Th989 a parute VOM "

2.30 p.m.

Resumed.

Potter in reply-

No evidemos of agency. Mere conjecture.

(Adjourned.

Page 30Page 31